The Greater SWVA Digital Collaborative (GSDC) Advisory Board is central to the functioning and governance of the community archive, even though Virginia Tech serves as the hosting institution. The GSDC’s governance model details the organization’s structure.
- Chair
- Treasurer
- Secretary
- Members-at-large
- VT Alternate
The advisory board includes representatives from Virginia Tech and various community organizations, including members who drafted the bylaws. The team’s primary objective is to incorporate as many diverse viewpoints as possible to enhance the effectiveness and inclusivity of governance.
Advisory Board Members
| Role | Term | Member | Organization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair | 2023-2024 | Ann-Margaret Shortt | Montgomery-Floyd Regional Library |
| Treasurer | 2023-2024 | Jenny Nehrt | Christiansburg Institute, Inc. |
| Secretary | 2023-2024 | Alex Kinnaman | Virginia Tech |
| Member-at-Large | 2023-2024 | David Rotenizer | Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Montgomery County Regional Tourism |
| Member-at-Large | 2023-2024 | Michael Hickman | Calfee Community & Cultural Center |
| Member-at-Large | 2023-2024 | Sherri Huffman | Blue Ridge Heritage |
| Virginia Tech Alternate | 2023-2024 | Wen Nie Ng | Virginia Tech |
| Virginia Tech Alternate | 2023-2024 | Anthony Wright de Hernandez | Virginia Tech |
Bylaws
| Governance Group Name | Advisory Board |
|---|---|
| Advisory Board Start Data | July 1, 2023 |
| Governing Structure |
Advisory Board:
|
| Number of Advisory Board Members | 9-13 |
| Advisory Board Member Qualifications |
|
| Advisory Board – Constraints |
|
| Selection process for the first Board |
|
| Advisory Board Member Term Length, Renewals, Limits |
Term length:
|
| Advisory Board Member Vacancies, Removals | Process if Advisory Member elects to leave:
|
| Officers | Positions and responsibilities:
|
| Meeting Schedule | Frequency: Monthly in the first year and as needed; Board may determine thereafter Convened by: Chair Agenda developed by: Chair |
| Decision-making Process | Processes: (Lazy) Robert’s Rules, meaning the Advisory Board is not beholden to follow all of the detailed rules in Robert’s Rules but does use the basic framework to pass official decisions and also turns to Robert’s Rules if and when they need more process for a meeting, discussion, or decision Quorum requirement: More than half of the full Board “body” (not limited to those attending live/in person to allow for scheduling and asynchronous participation) |
| Initial Duties, Advisory Board |
|
| Full Governance Structure Established by |
Group charged with completion: Working Group, established fall 2022 By-laws completion: Working Group, finalized 2023-04-28 Advisory Board Establish-by Date: July 2023 |
GSDC Conflict of Interest Policy
This Conflict of Interest Policy should be reviewed by the Advisory Board along with the By-laws each year during the first meeting following elections (July meeting).
Purpose
- Prevention of the personal interests of Advisory Board members from interfering with the performance of their duties to GSDC or engaging in activities that result in personal financial, professional, or political gain at the expense of GSDC or its supporters and other stakeholders.
- Promotion of honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, and the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code.
Process for reporting +/or identification:
- Full disclosure, by notice in writing, shall be made by the interested parties to the full Advisory Board in all conflicts of interest, including but not limited to the following:
- An Advisory Board Member is related to another Advisory Board Member or Staff member by blood, marriage, or domestic partnership.
- An Advisory Board Member or their organization stands to benefit from a GSDC transaction or to receive payment from or on behalf of GSDC for any subcontract, goods, or services other than as part of her/his regular job responsibilities or as reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred.
Process for resolution +/or mitigation:
- Following full disclosure of a possible conflict of interest or any condition listed above, the Advisory Board shall determine whether a conflict of interest exists, and if so, the Advisory Board shall vote to authorize or reject the transaction or take any other action deemed necessary to address the conflict and protect GSDC’s best interests. Both votes will be by a majority vote without counting the vote of any interested Advisor.
- If the disinterested Advisors are less than a quorum, a majority vote of disinterested Advisors will still be counted as long as at least one Advisor is disinterested.
- If a conflict of interest is discovered that has not been shared by the interested parties to the full Advisory Board, the Advisory Board shall vote as noted above and this may be grounds for dismissal of the interested parties from the Advisory Board.
GSDC Code of Conduct
This Code of Conduct should be reviewed by the Advisory Board along with the By-laws each year during the first meeting following elections (July meeting).
This code of conduct applies to all forms of participation in the GSDC and the SWVA community, including, but not limited to:
- Messages sent to the email list;
- Messages posted to social media outlets when representing the GSDC/SWVA or interacting with members of its community;
- Participation as a member, officer, or community guest in GSDC/SWVA committees, the GSDC Advisory Board, and any other sanctioned or created governance or task groups;
- Participation as an organizer, speaker, vendor, or other attendee at the GSDC/SWVA events.
For the purposes of this code, a “community member” is any individual who is engaging in an official capacity on behalf of the GSDC/SWVA.
Standards of conduct
The GSDC is dedicated to creating a harassment-free community for everyone regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, or religion. The GSDC will not tolerate harassment of—or by—members or guests of the community in any form. Sexual or discriminatory language and imagery is not appropriate for any GSDC community venue, whether virtual or in person. Community members or guests violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled at the discretion of the GSDC Board.
Harassment includes offensive verbal or written comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, religion; sexual and or discriminatory images in physical or virtual public spaces; deliberate intimidation, stalking, following, unwanted photography or recording; sustained disruption of talks or other events; inappropriate physical contact; and unwelcome sexual attention.
Addressing violations of the standards of conduct
If you are being harassed, notice that someone else is being harassed, or have any other concerns, please contact a member of the GSDC Advisory Board. Community members or guests asked to stop any harassing behavior are expected to comply immediately. If the harassment occurs in person (for example, at an event), the Advisory Board member will assist affected individuals in contacting hotel/venue security or local law enforcement, provide escorts, or otherwise assist those experiencing harassment to feel safe to the extent possible.
The Advisory Board member will then report the incident to the Advisory Board, who will determine what further action may be necessary. If a community member or guest engages in harassing behavior in any setting, the GSDC Advisory Board may take any action it deems appropriate, including warning the offender or expulsion from the venue or event. A follow-up report will be made to individuals who report being harassed.
Code of Conduct inspired by the Library Publishing Coalition’s Code of Conduct, the Digital Library Federation’s Code of Conduct, the ALA Code of Conduct, and the #critlib Unconference Code of Conduct.
